First Article Inspection (AS9102) Checklist
This free AS9102 first article inspection checklist helps aerospace manufacturers and their suppliers produce complete, first-pass-acceptable FAI packages. Thirty checkpoints cover the full FAI lifecycle: planning and trigger management, Form 1 part accountability, Form 2 materials and special processes, Form 3 characteristic accountability with 100% ballooning, documentation and approval, and ongoing program health including the delta FAI triggers that teams most often miss. Use it before submitting any FAI to a customer, when onboarding suppliers who submit FAIs to you, or as an internal audit aid - FAI rejections delay first shipments by weeks and are among the most preventable causes of late program starts.
0 of 32 items complete
10 critical items still open - these are the highest-risk gaps.
FAI Planning and Triggers
Form 1 - Part Number Accountability
Form 2 - Materials, Processes, and Inspections
Form 3 - Characteristic Accountability
Documentation, Review, and Approval
Ongoing FAI Program Health
Customer source inspectors and CB auditors reject FAIs most often for incomplete characteristic accountability, missing actuals, unapproved special process sources, and undetected delta FAI triggers - the critical-flagged items. Every unchecked critical item is a likely FAI rejection or audit finding; an unchecked item in the triggers group means you may be shipping today on an invalid FAI without knowing it.
Get your full FAI process gap report
We will email you a personalized analysis of your FAI process gaps with a fix sequence mapped to AS9102 requirements, and an aerospace quality specialist will follow up to review it.
No spam. Your results stay private. Unsubscribe anytime.
Why FAIs fail and how this checklist prevents it
Most rejected FAIs fail on completeness, not on part quality: a drawing note that was never ballooned, 'conforms' written where an actual measurement belongs, a plating cert from a non-approved processor, or a blank field on Form 2. AS9102 is explicit that every design characteristic must be uniquely accounted for with recorded results, and customer source inspectors check exactly that before they check anything else. The checklist front-loads the failure modes with critical flags: 100% characteristic accountability, actuals not attestations, approved special process sources, closed dispositions on any nonconformance, and production-representative build. Passing those five conditions eliminates the large majority of first-pass rejections.
The delta FAI triggers most teams miss
Full FAIs on new parts are rarely forgotten; the compliance gap is almost always the delta (partial) FAI on parts already in production. AS9102 requires a new or partial FAI when any of these occur:
- An engineering or design change affecting form, fit, or function - evaluated per change, not per drawing revision roll
- A change in manufacturing source, process, inspection method, tooling, or materials - including moving an operation between machines or suppliers
- A lapse in production of two years or more since the last completed run
- A change in manufacturing location, even within the same company
Interpreting your results and fixing the system
Gaps in the forms groups are documentation discipline problems - fixable with templates, ballooning software, and a second-person review before anything leaves the building. Gaps in the planning and program health groups are system problems and are more dangerous, because they mean invalid FAIs can ship without anyone deciding to cut a corner: a routing change nobody flagged, a two-year lapse nobody watched, a sub-tier source swap nobody caught. Fix the system gaps first by wiring triggers into the tools that already see the events - engineering change control should ask the delta-FAI question on every change, and the ERP should track last-production dates and block shipment against incomplete FAI status. Then measure first-pass acceptance rate; below roughly 85%, your FAI process is costing you shipment dates every month.
How Netray automates FAI management in your ERP
The delta FAI triggers that burn manufacturers - source changes, routing changes, production lapses - are all events your ERP already records. Netray configures Infor SyteLine, LN, and Baan to turn those records into controls: automatic flags when an item has not been produced in two years, FAI-required status on new and changed items that blocks shipment until cleared, engineering change workflows that force a delta-FAI evaluation, and sub-tier FAI tracking on purchase orders. Our on-prem AI goes further - extracting characteristics from drawings to accelerate ballooning, pre-filling Form 3 from CMM results, and checking packages for blank fields and cert mismatches before a human reviewer sees them.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a full FAI and a partial (delta) FAI?
A full FAI accounts for every design characteristic of the part and is required for the first production run of a new part number. A partial or delta FAI is performed after a qualifying change - design revision, process or source change, tooling change, production lapse of two years, or relocation - and covers only the characteristics affected by that change, while referencing the baseline FAI for everything else. The judgment call is scoping 'affected characteristics' honestly; customers reject delta FAIs scoped too narrowly.
Does the FAI part have to come from a real production run?
Yes. AS9102 requires the first article to be produced using the processes, tooling, equipment, and conditions intended for ongoing production, because the FAI validates the production process, not just one part. A part machined by your best programmer on a prototype setup proves nothing about run-rate production and is a common source of later escapes - the FAI passed but production never matched it. If the process changes after FAI, that change itself triggers a delta FAI.
Who is responsible for FAIs on parts we buy from sub-tier suppliers?
You are, from your customer's perspective. AS9102 and standard purchasing flowdowns make the higher-tier supplier responsible for ensuring sub-tier FAIs exist, are complete, and are available - your Form 1 must account for detail parts, referencing their FAIs. Practically, that means requiring FAIs on your POs for new or changed purchased details, reviewing them with the same rigor a customer applies to yours, and tracking their status so a sub-tier source change does not silently invalidate your assembly-level FAI.
Run your next FAI package against this checklist before your customer's source inspector does.
Related Tools
AS9100 Audit Readiness Checklist
A 30-point checklist for AS9100 Rev D certification and surveillance audits, weighted toward the aerospace-specific requirements where auditors write the most findings.
Aerospace & DefenseAerospace Supplier Scorecard
Rate a supplier across 10 criteria - OTD, quality escapes, AS9100 status, FAI performance, CAPA responsiveness, compliance flowdown, and financial health - for an instant risk rating.
Aerospace & DefenseCounterfeit Parts Risk Assessment (AS5553)
A 10-question assessment of your counterfeit electronic parts exposure, aligned to AS5553 and DFARS counterfeit prevention requirements, with a risk band and mitigation plan.
Go Deeper
DoD AI Adoption in 2026: What It Means for Defense Manufacturers
DoD AI adoption in 2026: what CDAO programs, budget priorities, and new acquisition rules mean for defense manufacturers planning their own AI investments now.
CMMC-Compliant AI Deployment: What Level 2 Contractors Must Know
CMMC-compliant AI deployment explained: how Level 2 defense contractors can run AI on CUI without expanding assessment scope. Controls, enclaves, and costs.