With vs Without Netray

The Netray Difference

See how AI-native implementation compares to traditional consulting. Every metric backed by real project data.

60% Faster
45% Under Budget
Zero Critical Defects

Head-to-Head Comparison

Scroll to see each metric animate. Less bar = better outcome.

Timeline

Average time from kickoff to go-live

Traditional
18 months
With Netray
7 months

Budget Variance

Deviation from planned implementation cost

Traditional
51% over budget
With Netray
45% under budget

Testing Phase

End-to-end testing and validation time

Traditional
5 months manual
With Netray
2 months AI-powered

Documentation

Quality and currency of project documentation

Traditional
Manual & outdated
With Netray
Auto-generated & current

Critical Defects

Post go-live critical defect count

Traditional
Variable
With Netray
Zero critical

Project Visibility

How leadership sees project status

Traditional
Weekly reports
With Netray
Real-time dashboard

Watch the Race

A real-time simulation showing traditional vs AI-powered implementation progress. Watch the gap widen.

Traditional Implementation
0%

~18 months | 51% over budget | Manual testing | Weekly status reports

With Netray AI Agents
0%

~7 months | 45% under budget | AI-powered testing | Real-time dashboard

The Numbers Tell the Story

60%
Faster Delivery
45%
Cost Savings
0
Critical Defects
24/7
Real-time Visibility

Real Results

From actual Netray-powered implementations

Infor SyteLine

Mid-Market Manufacturer

Go-live in 5 months vs. planned 14 months

64% time reduction, zero critical defects at launch

Infor LN

Multi-site Distributor

Testing completed in 6 weeks instead of 5 months

3,200+ test scripts auto-generated and validated by AI

Infor M3

Process Manufacturer

Data migration validated in 3 days, not 3 weeks

99.7% data accuracy on first migration run

See It in Action

Talk to our team about how Netray can accelerate your Infor implementation. No obligations, just a real conversation.