Manufacturing ERP Selection: A Structured Decision Framework
Selecting a manufacturing ERP is a 10-15 year commitment with $1M-$10M at stake. Yet most selection processes are driven by vendor demos, consultant recommendations, and feature checklists that do not predict implementation success. The organizations that make the best ERP decisions use structured evaluation frameworks that go beyond features to assess total cost of ownership, implementation risk, vendor viability, and cultural fit. This guide provides that framework.
Beyond the Feature Checklist
Every modern manufacturing ERP checks most feature boxes. The differences that matter are in depth, usability, and fit for your specific manufacturing mode. A make-to-stock plastic manufacturer has fundamentally different needs than an engineer-to-order aerospace company. Generic feature comparisons miss these distinctions. Focus your evaluation on the 20% of functionality that differentiates your manufacturing operations—your competitive advantages should drive system selection, not commodity capabilities.
- Identify 15-20 critical process scenarios unique to your manufacturing and evaluate those specifically
- Weight evaluation criteria by business impact: a 10% improvement in planning is worth more than perfect AP
- Require vendor demos using your actual data and scenarios rather than canned demonstration scripts
- Evaluate with your real users, not just IT—shop floor workers and planners must validate usability
TCO and Risk Evaluation
True ERP selection requires total cost of ownership modeling over 7-10 years, including licensing, implementation, customization, integration, training, ongoing support, and upgrade costs. It also requires risk assessment: vendor financial stability, product roadmap alignment with your needs, implementation partner depth, and the availability of consultants and support resources for each platform being considered.
- Model TCO over 7-10 years including all cost categories, not just licensing and implementation
- Assess vendor financial stability and product investment trajectory for long-term viability
- Evaluate implementation partner ecosystem depth—at least 3 qualified partners per platform considered
- Check consultant availability and rate trends for each platform in your geographic region
AI-Powered Selection Analysis
Netray's AI agents support ERP selection by analyzing your manufacturing processes, comparing them against platform capabilities databases, and generating objective scoring models. The agents eliminate vendor marketing bias by focusing on verified capabilities and real user experiences from PeerSpot, Gartner, and industry forums.
Make a data-driven ERP decision—get an AI-powered vendor comparison for your requirements.
Related Resources
Epicor vs Infor: Migration Comparison for Manufacturers
Compare Epicor Kinetic vs Infor CloudSuite for manufacturing. Functional analysis, migration costs, and decision framework for switching platforms.
ERPInfor CloudSuite Implementation Best Practices
Infor CloudSuite implementation best practices with AI. Project methodology, change management, testing strategies, and go-live preparation.
ERPERP Implementation Cost Overruns: Prevention Strategies
Prevent ERP implementation cost overruns. Data-driven strategies for scope control, realistic budgeting, risk mitigation, and change management.