ERP Implementation Cost Overruns: How to Prevent Them
ERP implementations exceed their budget 67% of the time, with average overruns of 25-50%. For mid-market manufacturers implementing Infor, the financial impact of a 50% overrun on a $2M project is devastating—$1M in unplanned spending that was allocated elsewhere. The causes are well-documented but persistently ignored: underscoped data migration, unrealistic timelines, scope creep during UAT, and underestimated change management effort. Prevention requires discipline from day one, not damage control during testing.
Where the Money Actually Goes
Cost overruns cluster in five predictable areas. Data migration is consistently underestimated by 50-100% because discovery reveals data quality issues invisible in the initial assessment. Integration development exceeds estimates because legacy system documentation is incomplete or inaccurate. Customization scope grows during UAT as users identify gaps not caught in design. Testing takes longer than planned because defects require rework cycles. Training costs double when initial training proves insufficient for go-live readiness.
- Data migration: 50-100% overrun average due to undiscovered data quality issues and complex transformations
- Integration development: 40-80% overrun from incomplete legacy system documentation and edge cases
- Customization scope growth: 15-25% increase during UAT from gaps discovered in user acceptance testing
- Extended testing cycles: 30-50% overrun from defect rework that was not budgeted in the original plan
Prevention Strategies That Work
The most effective cost control starts before the project begins. Conduct a thorough data assessment before finalizing the budget—not after. Include a formal contingency of 20-25% and protect it from scope additions. Implement rigorous change control from project kickoff. Dedicate business users full-time during critical phases instead of splitting their time. Most importantly, challenge every estimate with evidence from comparable projects.
- Conduct data quality assessment during presales/planning phase, not after contracts are signed
- Budget 20-25% contingency and require formal change requests with cost impact for scope additions
- Mandate full-time business user dedication during design, testing, and cutover phases minimum
- Benchmark estimates against industry data—challenge any phase estimate below 25th percentile
AI-Driven Budget Protection
Netray's AI agents analyze project progress against budget in real-time, identifying early warning signs of cost overruns. The agents compare your project metrics against patterns from hundreds of ERP implementations to predict which budget areas are at risk before overruns become irreversible. Early warning enables corrective action when it is still cost-effective.
Protect your ERP budget—get AI-powered project risk monitoring from day one.
Related Resources
Infor LN Implementation Timeline: Realistic Expectations
Get realistic Infor LN implementation timelines. Typical phase durations, common delays, resource requirements, and how to avoid schedule overruns.
ERPInfor CloudSuite Implementation Best Practices
Infor CloudSuite implementation best practices with AI. Project methodology, change management, testing strategies, and go-live preparation.
ERPERP Consultant Shortage: How to Cope and Thrive
Address the ERP consultant shortage affecting Infor, SAP, and Oracle implementations. Strategies for finding talent, reducing dependency, and using AI.